Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Google vs Microsoft in Android Patent Dispute


Google and Microsoft have been going at it the past few days over patent disputes. Google recently shot back at Microsoft and revealed that Google had turned down the opportunity to partner up with Microsoft in bidding for patents.
So lets start from the beginning. Google's Cheif Legal Officer, David Drummond, apparently accused company's like Apple and Microsoft of participating in an organized campaign to take Google's Android platform down though patent lawsuits.
Brad Smith from Microsoft then soon revealed that Google was talking a load of crap and that Google was offered to partner up but had turned down an offer to bid for patents together. Frank Shaw, Microsoft's Head of Communications, posted an email discussing the deal between Google and Microsoft. He even tweeted "Free advice for David Drummond[Google] – next time check with Kent Walker[Google] before you blog."
Drummond responded by saying, "It's not surprising that Microsoft would want to divert attention by pushing a false 'gotcha!' while failing to address the substance of the issues we raised. Making sure that we would be unable to assert these patents to defend Android — and having us pay for the privilege — must have seemed like an ingenious strategy to them. We didn't fall for it."
Frank Shaw, from Microsoft, responded on twitter by saying: "We offered Google the opportunity to bid with us to buy the Novell patents; they said no. Why? BECAUSE they wanted to buy something that they could use to assert against someone else. SO partnering with others & reducing patent liability across industry is not something they wanted to help do."
So apparently, Google did turn down Microsoft's offer. It makes sense because if Google did buy the patents together with Microsoft, it would not have helped them against any litigation against Microsoft. But really, does this sort of public bickering really need to take place?
Yeah, doubt this little fight is over. Lets see who says what next!

Monday, 25 July 2011

Top 104 Photographers To Circle In Google+

 100 brilliant photographers for you to follow.Google+ is a great showcase for professional photographers. With in-house editing tools like Picnik, and beautiful ways to display your work, photographers can really shine. 


  1. +Alan Shapiro
  2. +Alex Koloskov 
  3. +Alexander S. Kunz 
  4. +Alexandre Buisse 
  5. +Alfie Goodrich
  6. +Alfred Plyer Photography
  7. +Andrea Acailawen
  8. +Beau Kahler
  9. +Bjorn van Sinttruije 
  10. +Brian Matiash
  11. +Carl Stovell
  12. +Cassius Wright
  13. +Chris Collacott
  14. +Chris Marquardt
  15. +Christian Anderson
  16. +Christopher Jay
  17. +Christopher Michel
  18. +Colby Brown 
  19. +Damien Franco
  20. +Dave Beckerman 
  21. +Dan Carr
  22. +Dave Cox
  23. +Dave Powell
  24. +Dariusz Majgier
  25. +dominique palombieri 
  26. +Eric Kim
  27. +Eric Leslie
  28. +Erly Bahsan
  29. +Felipe Apostol
  30. +FFrame
  31. +Frank Doorhof
  32. +G Dan Mitchell
  33. +Gary Austin
  34. +Gary Crabbe
  35. +Giulio Bassi
  36. +Giuseppe Basile
  37. +Greg Schmigel
  38. +Guido Steenkamp
  39. +Heimo Wenzel 
  40. +helen sotiriadis 
  41. +Jacek Smoter
  42. +Jan H. Andersen
  43. +Jao van de Lagemaat
  44. +Jarek Klimek - Editor in Chief and Co-founder of 1150 Pixel Photography Magazine
  45. +Jesse Pafundi 
  46. +Jim Goldstein
  47. +Joe Azure
  48. +Johannes Kick
  49. +John Powell EFIAP DPAGB
  50. +Joshua Powell
  51. +Kieran O'Connor Photography 
  52. +Kjetil Greger Pedersen
  53. +Klaus Herrmann
  54. +Kyle Marquardt
  55. +Leanne Staples 
  56. +Lotus Carroll 
  57. +Mark Stagi 
  58. +Matt Weber 
  59. +Miami Tom 
  60. +Michael Russell
  61. +Michiel de Lange Photography
  62. +Mihailo Radicevic
  63. +Mike Olbinski 
  64. +Mike Shaw Photography
  65. +Nate Zeman Photography
  66. +Neal Urban
  67. +Nichole McCall
  68. +Nicole S. Young
  69. +Patrick Di Fruscia
  70. +Patrick Smith
  71. +Paul R. Giunta
  72. +Pierrick Blons
  73. +QT Luong
  74. +Rick Sammon
  75. +Ricky L. Jones Photography
  76. +Rob Daugherty
  77. +Robbie Schmelzer
  78. +Robert Larson
  79. +Roland Vogt
  80. +Romain Guy
  81. +Roman Tripler 
  82. +Ron Niebrugge 
  83. +Sathish Jothikumar
  84. +Saurabh Deoras 
  85. +Scott Jarvie
  86. +Seung Kye Lee
  87. +Shane Srogi
  88. +Star Rush
  89. +Stephen Ingraham
  90. +Steve Febbraro  
  91. +Takahiro Yamamoto
  92. +Terje Sørgjerd
  93. +Terry Nelson
  94. +Thom Hogan
  95. +Thomas Hawk
  96. +Thomas Leuthard
  97. +Tony Eccles
  98. +Tony Sharp 
  99. +Trey Ratcliff - Google+ superstar with over 45,000 followers
  100. +Trond Lindholm
  101. +Varina Patel
  102. +Victor Bezrukov
  103. +Vivienne Gucwa
  104. +William Burrard-Lucas 

Photo Website Founders

Google+ Photos/Picnik 


    Googler Steve Lacey Killed by Drunk Driver


    Google engineer Steve Lacey, 43, a veteran of the Seattle region’s tech community who worked for more than a decade at Microsoft, died Sunday in a car crash in Kirkland.
    KING 5 News reports that that Lacey was the victim of a road rage incident in which he hadn’t been involved. A widely respected software engineer who often displayed his sense of humor on his well-read blog, Lacey had two children, ages 5 and 7. He and his wife had recently celebrated their 10th anniversary.
    Lacey, who received his master’s in software engineering in his native U.K., moved to Redmond in 1997 from London, two years after the 3D graphics startup where he worked was acquired by Microsoft. His online bio describes his work at Microsoft and demonstrates his passion for technology.

    Lacey left Microsoft in January 2006 to start SwitchGear software with another former Microsoftie, Joe Stacy. Later that year, Lacey joined Google’s Kirkland office.
    “The food was too good to be ignored,” he explained in his bio.
    He also worked briefly at Facebook last year, according to his Google+ profile, but he had been working most recently at Google, focusing on Chrome video.
    In the incident Sunday afternoon, state troopers told KING-5 that the driver of a Hyundai Sonata lost control, rolled and crashed into a BMW being driven by Lacey on NE 85th Street. The Hyundai driver had exited Interstate 405 at high speed in pursuit of another car that the Hyundai driver says cut him off on the freeway. KING reports that investigators believe the Hyundai driver had been drinking.

    Saturday, 23 July 2011

    Bradley Horowitz and Vic Gundotra Interview With Techcrunch


    Miss the TechCrunch Q&A with Bradley Horowitz (Google's VP Product) and  Vic Gundotra (Google's VP Social)? Transcribed some of the most interesting quotes below.

    Why is Google+ called a "project"?
    VG: Project we think implies a longer term effort. We think project is more inclusive. We're going to build this thing together with the community, with various parts of Google, and we're pretty excited about it.

    Are you the fathers of Google+?
    BH: This project involved many, many people, a lot of talented people on the team that have been pouring their enthusiasm, their passion into this project for a long time. Vic and I have been honored to be part of that team, and sort of shepherd it along; there's a role for us on that team, I think, but the contributions of the team itself are what make the product sing.

    What is the focus of Google+?
    BH: Putting people first. Understanding that the Web is more than a Web of pages, or even a Web of apps, it's a Web of people. People is the fabric that connects us together. The pages and the apps are really artifacts. If we understand people, who you know, what you care about, those kinds of things, we can provide a great service to you, across all that Google does. So it's not just Google+ itself, but understanding who the user is will make a better search, will make a better maps, will make a better Chrome and Android. So that was the basic premise - in understanding people, we could return tremendous value to our users.

    So people come before the algorithm?
    VG: We think a basic human need is the need to connect with others. And one of the best ways to connect with others is to share something with them. And today that sharing is happening online. But when we look at how sharing happens online, we think in many ways it's broken. Many of the nuances that we have in the real world, looking at somebody, making eye contact with them, adjusting the volume of our voice to a whisper when it's confidential, all these subtleties, the richness that we have in real life is very much lost in the online world. We're given very harsh choices, like limit your communication to "this long" and it all has to be public. Or we have to bucket everybody, all your relationships, into "these are my friends." So we think there's tremendous room for innovation to get the online world to more closely resemble the richness of how we really share and connect with people.

    Why should an ordinary person, a regular Internet user, be on Google+? What can you offer that other services like Facebook and Twitter don't?
    BH: There are many points of differentiation in the product. And as you pointed out, we haven't even launched yet. We have a limited field trial to market. We are humbled and overwhelmed by the response. When we say limited field trial, I think a lot of people apply the word limited to the size of the audience, whereas we think of limited as limited in functionality. For instance, it has been noticed that we don't have business profiles as part of the system. We have not launched the sum total of what we intend to launch. In fact, as we have said, this is a project that is very long term. So there are many more pieces of functionality that are on the way. We're certainly accelerating their launch in response to the enthusiasm we're seeing in the market. But we didn't expect, frankly, and this isn't posturing, we did not expect this kind of interest this soon. And so many of the things that would make the product comfortable to someone who isn't a technophile or in Silicon Valley are not yet in the product, but they're coming.

    What's the thinking behind Hangouts?
    VG: We thought, why is it -- considering we have cameras on virtually all of our devices. We carry our devices all over the place. We have high speed networks. Then we asked our friends and family, do you do video chat with your family? It was amazing that most people said no. Very, very few people used video chat. And when we analyzed it, we found there were 3 primary reasons: number 1, group video chat costs money and it's expensive, and people didn't want to pay. Number 2, it's hard to set up, calling your dad to have him install this software, get past the virus protection, and having him configure it, it's just too much of a hurdle. But the biggest issue, it was socially awkward. It was really awkward to have some free time at 10 o'clock at night, send a message to some friends and say, hey, do you want to start a video chat? What if your friend isn't dressed correctly? What if it makes her feel awkward? What if she says no? Then you may feel rejected. So we worked on the social dynamics. And what Hangouts does, it allows you, in a very nice way, it's not socially awkward, to say, hey I'm hanging out on my porch. I'm available, if you're available too, you can join. And as friends join you, as more and more people join you in your front yard, on your porch, your neighbors can see that and can join you, and say, 'Oh, it's Vic, talking to Bradley, and Lisa's there, and I'm going to join in too, now I feel comfortable.' So the dynamic we started to create is unlike many of these other services. Lower the barrier and make it fun.

    Can you talk about your embrace of privacy with Google+?
    BH: For us, privacy isn't something buried six panels deep on some setting that you can set and forget. The model itself inspires trust. The fact that anytime I post something, I get to choose who gets to see it. Anytime I comment on something, I can see who's in the room and understand the audience that I'm addressing. These sorts of things are comforting to people, and they've been absent from tools. And I think people haven't even recognized why they're uncomfortable sharing something until the light is shone on these and you can actually understand these basic principles.

    How can people get involved in Google+?
    VG: First of all, the folks who have been giving us feedback on Google+, thank you. Our team has been paying serious attention, responding to as much as it can, and you can really be involved by helping to guide the project by giving us your viewpoint. In terms of getting a job at Google, we're always looking for talented people. One of our biggest challenges is finding qualified people that can contribute to our project. If you have an interest in working with Google, we're interested in hearing from you."

    Friday, 22 July 2011

    Google+ Profile Images Now Appearing Beside Search Listings

    Google+ has only been out for a few weeks and it is already having major impact on search engine optimization. We shared earlier this week general ideas about how Google+ will impact search, but today we have our first major example. Google has begun to roll out a change to its search engine results page in which an author profile image and name appears at the far right of the individual search listing. Additionally the image and name links directly to the author's Google+ profile page.

    This is a dramtic change to Google's classic results page. It completely changes the visual weight of the results. Even though the mashable article is ranked fourth in this search, the addition of the image and name guide your eye to that link. This could have a significant impact on click-through rates for results that include an author image.
    How Does This Work?

    Thanks to the keen eye of HubSpot resident SEO genius Brian Whalley, we have dicovered that is change works for sites using the "rel=me" tag. Currently these sites include TechCrunch, Mashable, and GigaOm, but this list could soon include your site as well. The "rel=me" tag is a simple tag that a person can use across the web to tell Google that what may appear to be separate pages, are actually all about the same person.

    Basically it is a three step process to get this to work for your website:

    1. Have a link that includes rel="author me" in your blog article. Such as <a href="http://mashable.com/author/jennifer-van-grove/" rel="author me"> like Jennifer's does.

    2. On the linked page (http://mashable.com/author/jennifer-van-grove/), link to the Google+ profile for the author. Include the tag, <a href="https://plus.google.com/100834378485895409468" rel="external nofollow me">AnchorText</a>

    3. Now google knows that the author of that article has a specific page.
    On her Google+ profile she links back to her Mashable profile in the "Links" area, and indicated that the link was about her via the checkbox when adding a link, so that it's established that both profiles are the same person and reciprocal.

    These three steps explain how Google knows to show a certain profile images along side a specific result. To learn more about "rel=me" check out this post on Google's Webmaster Forum.

    Marketing Takeaway

    Google+ is new but already having a major impact on Google Search. Including profile images of authors along site search listings is a major change to what had traditionally been a non-visual page. If you have a blog you should start using "rel=me" tags right away to have your Google+ profile image appear next to your resutls in an effort to make them more social and better stand out on the page. Keep an eye out for future cahnges to google's search to make it more social.